| |
Execution Day
by Geov Parrish
The state of Washington announced last week that, on October 13, 1998, it
will commit murder. The victim will be Jeremy Vargas Sagastegui, 27, of the
Tri-Cities.
To be more precise, since Sagastegui has waived all appeals and repeatedly
insisted on his desire to die, the execution will be an elaborate (and
expensive) assisted suicide.
Sagastegui will be the third Washington state prisoner executed since the
state resumed the death penalty in 1977, the most recent being in May 1994.
Thirteen other prisoners are also on Death Row here.
Sagastegui's guilt of a grotesque crime is not in question; he murdered a
toddler he was babysitting, and then the infant's mother and a friend when
they returned. It has never been determined, however, whether he was
competent to stand trial and represent himself in court. His insistence on
dying meant that he presented no mitigating factors in the sentencing phase
of his trial.
The question of competency and lack of advocacy for his own life bring
Sagastegui's sentence into question. But capital cases are always
questionable; there is almost always, in this world of humans and their
errors, something that could have been done differently to change the
verdict. The application of the death penalty--a tiny minority of the
murder cases in the U.S. each year--is almost entirely unrelated to the
brutality of the crime or history of the perpetrator. Instead, the most
reliable indicators--as with Sagastegui, who is
Mexican-American/Basque--are the defendant's income level and the color of
his or her skin.
Ultimately, the state should not execute Jeremy Vargas Sagastegui, not
because of any details of his case, but because the state should not be in
the business of executing anybody. For all of the arguments against
capital punishment--the cost (far more than life imprisonment), the lack of
deterrence, the race and class bias, the risk of killing someone innocent
of his or her crime--the most powerful argument is the simplest. A
government should not be handed the power to kill individuals (no matter
how repulsive), and we as a society shouldn't be endorsing it.
State-sanctioned murder is still murder. The casualness with which the
announcement of Sagastegui's execution date was met--it was a minor news
item, and protesters aren't exactly choking the streets--is a measure of
how cheaply we have come to regard human life. The death penalty is, quite
simply, barbaric. Abolish it.
For more information on opposing the death penalty and Sagastegui's
execution, contact the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty at
206-622-8952.
|