| |
The Real Sex Fanatics
by Maria Tomchick
Last week we reported that two Republicans, both critics of Pres. Clinton,
were outed as adulterers: Rep. Helen Chenoweth of Idaho (who slept with her
former business partner--presumably in the workplace) and Rep. Dan Burton
of Indiana (who admitted having fathered a child in an extramarital
affair). Both are arch-conservatives who openly espouse "family values,"
but whose actions show they secretly believe that a little cheating on the
side is okay.
To top it all off, last week news broke that the leader of Clinton's
impeachment review, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry Hyde
(R-Illinois), has admitted that he had an affair with a married woman in
the 1960s. Fred Snodgrass, the ex-husband of Hyde's lover, told the
Associated Press: "It's ridiculous. He had an affair with a young woman
with three children. At least the president didn't do that." Snodgrass went
on to call Hyde a "super hypocrite" and broke into tears as he told of how
Hyde's affair ruined the Snodgrass marriage.
Following in Chenoweth's footsteps, Hyde denied that he had done anything
wrong and pompously replied: "The statute of limitations has long since
passed on my youthful indiscretions ... After Mr. Snodgrass confronted my
wife, the friendship ended and my marriage remained intact." Hyde neglected
to mention that he had lied to Mrs. Snodgrass during their affair by
telling her he was single at the time. He was also just beginning his
career as a state representative, and his "youthful indiscretions" continued
until 46 years of age (he's now 70).
These revelations about ultra-conservative Republicans are funny, but
they're also revealing. We can now infer that years of railing against
"satanic feminism" and immorality may be inspired by a weird dynamic of
guilt, repression, and projection within the Christian-fundamentalist
mindset.
For example, punishing welfare recipients by launching a campaign against
teenage welfare mothers of color may be understood as the response of
guilty filanderers to their own racist, pedophilic wet dreams. The bombing
and/or attempts to close down abortion clinics and make abortion (indeed,
any form of contraception) illegal, may be read as a repetition/compulsion
syndrome brought on by a need to erase their "youthful indiscretions" from
memory. Of course, they could just be a bunch of sexist bigots. But the
fact that they get away with this stuff also says a lot about our
own values, actions (most of us have had our own "indiscretions"), and
resulting feelings of guilt. People make mistakes, break promises, give in
to desires, and do stupid things; the sin is to not acknowledge those
mistakes, to lie about them, cover them up, and try to forget about them.
In reality, they never go away; the more they're repressed, the more they
become obsessions. So begins a vicious cycle of denial, repetition, shame,
and the use or abuse of power to deflect the blame onto somebody else.
I don't want to be accused of psychologizing politics or foreign policy,
but here's a perfect example of deflecting blame or projecting guilt onto
someone else: the Senate's foreign operations appropriations bill.
Reactionary House Republicans have attached a rider to the bill called the
Global Gag Rule. Yes, you guessed it: the rider would prevent any group
operating overseas from accepting U.S. funds if they even mention abortion
to their clients.
Now let's be frank about this. No U.S. funds have been spent on abortions
overseas since 1973. None. On the face of it, this rider seems geared to
stop family planning clinics from offering abortion services at all (which,
by the way, they already pay for with their own money). But it
reality, it's meant to withhold necessary operating funds from most
family planning clinics. It would kill contraceptive aid to the countries
where it's needed most, at a time when pregnancy-related mortalities are
the leading cause of death for women in developing nations. If that's not
designed purely to punish women of color, then I don't know what the
objective is.
It's been proven time and again that the combination of contraception,
education, and employment opportunities for women reduce unwanted
pregnancies, lower the number of children per family, and lower the
abortion rate. Now we can assume that, by closing off women's access to
all three of these things, right-wing members of the Republican Party may
be acting out their repressed desires to commit adultery and to make every
woman a "sex slave"--a collective fantasy that makes Clinton's assignations
with Monica seem wholesome by comparison.
Or they could just be stupid sexist bigots. You decide.
|